Where else in America are differences among neighbors settled by forums where unproven claims can be tossed around? And, if the HOA plans to take votes to seek majority opinions, that would be totally inappropriate.
#NEPTUNE TOWNSHIP LICENSE#
“The CMA asserts that owning the land under our homes gives the CMA license to do as they want.” No evidence.Ĭonclusion: The CMA is being singled out by the newly arrogant HOA as it presents undocumented charges. “There is a growing conflict” in town: No evidenceĬ. The HOA says that the CMA “won’t openly support our LGBTQ community,” but it is not the CMA’s responsibility to do that.ī. “The CMA is the enemy of diversity and of the LGBTQ community.” No evidence. The only remedy available to the HOA should be constructive criticism, but judging from their tone, the CMA won’t find that.Ĭonsider some assertions from the HOA announcement Most of them are baseless:Ī. The HOA forum seems likely to stir the pot and to produce nothing productive. I don’t see any of that mentioned in the HOA announcement. Our approach has always been about freedom of speech and religion. But this forum, which will have similar complaints, will try to bludgeon the CMA, and that would be unreasonable and unproductive. They are asking to be sued over their reckless and discriminatory charges.īlogfinger has written many articles complaining about CMA practices from creches in the park, crosses on the beach, expanded programming designed to turn the Grove into a “Christian Seaside Resort,” and to plan to attract thousands of religious tourists which would potentially overshadow the lifestyles of majority secular Grovers and their residential community.īut our Blogfinger articles have been meant to encourage the CMA to change their policies and to respond to public opinion. The HOA says that “controversy is percolating in OG over certain actions by the CMA–in service of their religious missions.” But they have established no solid evidence to substantiate their claims. The HOA goals seem to be to fan flames of discontent when just sparks exist. There are those in town who have been critical of the CMA, but how many of them would want to see this phony kangaroo court, ie “forum,” be called into session? This HOA “forum” idea is arrogant and likely to be divisive and useless and even explosive.
They are not elected, so what gives them the idea that they can call out the CMA, publicly hound it, and then “take aggressive positions” against it? They discriminate by not allowing renters to join. The OGHOA is a powerless organization that represents a small membership compared to the 3,000 census-counted citizens in the Grove.
However the items mentioned have very little evidence to justify being included in their announcement. They have scheduled a “forum” devoted to finding reasons to attack the CMA. The Ocean Grove Home Owners Association of late is beginning to appear like a bully looking for a fight against the Camp Meeting Association. Beautiful music in the Great Auditorium of Ocean Grove.
0 kommentar(er)
